A fluent answer can still invent a product claim or miss the buyer’s problem. I define what the system can use, what it must return and who checks the result.
The pilot includes difficult inputs and a manual fallback. AI can prepare options and assist production; budget decisions, factual approval and customer-facing release retain named human ownership.
What I need from you: The repeated task, approved company information, examples of acceptable output and a reviewer who can assess the result.
Select the challenges that look familiar.
Select the work you want AI to improve first.
Choose an area. See what I check and where I would focus the work.
I prioritise repeatable use cases by practical value and the review effort they require.
I define the brief, brand context and editorial checks before increasing production.
I build reusable prompt structures with the necessary context and clear quality criteria.
I validate important claims against reliable sources and connect the findings to a business decision.
I connect performance analysis with business context, evidence and human review.
I define sensitive-data rules, tool access and approval steps for the workflows being used.
AI becomes far more useful once those foundations are clear.
Open the part that matters to you. The detail is here when you need it.
A campaign brief, research summary, content adaptation or recurring report gives us a practical starting point. We test whether AI improves that job before multiplying tools, prompts or content variants.
AI can organize material and suggest possibilities, but a confident explanation does not establish a cause. Source checks, verified calculations and named reviewers keep the decision separate from the fluency of the draft.
I use AI to support English, French and Arabic content, with human checks on terminology, expression and commercial meaning. The goal is a usable local asset, not a fast translation that sounds unnatural to the reader.
I can select the use case, build reusable briefs and prompts, define review steps and help the team refine the system. Approved data and tool choices are part of the design, with ownership for updates and exceptions.
The exact stack matters less than choosing the right tool for the right workflow.
Five engagements, each with its original business context. Follow the choice, implementation and outcome; we adapt the relevant method to your B2B journey.
AI-Assisted Writing · Prompt Systems · EN / FR / AR Editorial Review
Editors spent less time repairing AI drafts: approved-content time fell from six hours to three and a half, with language-specific guidance and human review.
6 Hours → 3.5 Hours Brief-to-Approved Draft · 42% → 68% First-Review Acceptance · 100% Human Approval Before Publication · 8-Week Multilingual Pilot
Read the case studyAI Ideation · Customer Research · Paid Media Creative Testing
The team tested twelve genuinely different campaign ideas, producing three useful decisions instead of another collection of cosmetic ad variations.
5 → 12 Distinct Hypotheses Tested · 3 Tests Produced Useful Decisions · Best Validated Variant +18% Qualified Conversion Rate · 10-Week Creative Testing Program
Read the case studyAI-Assisted Research · Source-Linked Notes · Decision Briefs
Research briefs took seven hours instead of twelve, with source links and conflicting evidence kept visible for the leadership decision.
12 Hours → 7 Hours Brief Preparation · 100% Source Traceability for Material Claims · 2 Unsupported Assumptions Caught Before Presentation · 6 Research Cycles
Read the case studyAI-Assisted Lifecycle Content · CRM Segments · Email Tests
A controlled pilot improved conversions by 14% while reducing production time, using a limited set of customer journeys the team could maintain.
+14% conversions vs control · -35% Production Time · 100% of Messages Passed Editorial Review · 12-Week Personalization Pilot
Read the case studyAI-Assisted Analysis · Validated Dashboards · Prompt Templates
First-draft analysis time halved across eight reports, with calculations checked and explanations kept separate from confirmed facts.
3 hours → 90 minutes first-draft analysis time · 100% Checked Material Figures · Documented Uncertainty in Every Final Summary · Named Next Action in Every Report · 8 Weekly Reporting Cycles
Read the case studyHave a related project? Let’s discuss the scope.
Discuss your growth challenge ↗AI Marketing / Your next move
Bring the task you repeat, an approved example and the mistakes you cannot afford. We can scope a pilot around those boundaries.